External review¶
The review lives in the project wiki, not in this repository.
A commissioned review is a point-in-time record, true of the code as it stood on 2026-07-01, read afterwards for the findings it reached and what we decided about each. Keeping it here buried the living documentation it sat beside, so it moved, the same way the specs did.
| Page | Scope |
|---|---|
| validation & disposition | What we validated against the code, and where each finding went |
| architecture review | The consolidated report on perf, security, parity, and the dual-backend proposal |
| feature parity · supplementary | Feature gaps vs native FFmpeg |
| performance · supplementary | Perf characteristics and code-level bottlenecks |
| security · supplementary | Sandbox posture and hardening gaps |
| engine architecture, two models · cross-review | Two frontier models, independently then marking each other, on whether thirty-seven defects were mistakes or symptoms (2026-08) |
Filenames were normalised to the wiki's kebab-case on the move: ARCHITECTURE_REVIEW.md
became architecture-review, and each *_supplementary.md became *-supplementary.